> nice difference of maybe one octave or two. > formant style sounds too (about mid resonance, and you should use a > From what I understand, to create a notch you need to use separate ![]() ?However, I won't be able to do that until I > panel, then I should be able to get all kinds of interesting timbres > was done to get that sound, to see if my filter can do it as well. > All the other clips I think I can emulate. > notch setting at high resonance like that soundclip on the MOTM 420 > One thing, though: I can't seem to reproduce the "formant" sound with > other to a 30k resistor which is grounded. ?One end tap of the pot is connected to the opamp output, and > negative input of the opamp, and on the other end to the centre tap of a ?In this case, the zeners are connected on one end to > I don't know if you posted any details before. > response here! You have not created a notch, what you have is an > I think the phase response is much more important than the amplitude > proper notch filter, but more of a smooth dip in (log) amplitude at the ?It's not a sharp notch like one would expect from > amplitude at the cutoff frequency (with zero resonance) is 6db (i.e., > single filter, I do indeed get a kind of gentle notch. > In simulation, if I feed the input into both the HP and LP destinations Or BP->HP? Not sure where the bandpass bit came from I thought you coupled LP and HP in parallel. > of a 12dB bandpass and a 12dB highpass. ?Mathematically, it's a series combination Tell for sure that you couldn't do something like that with the centre ![]() ?I'm not always "down" with the "lingo".Īhh ok :) I'm asking because I'm not good enough with electronics to > Maybe they assume you're buying tantalum caps from them that have the '+'įrom cheater00 at Wed Sep 1 08:19:01 2010įrom: cheater00 at (cheater cheater) > On Tue, at 2:54 PM, Harry Bissell wrote:įrom megaohm1 at Wed Sep 1 06:04:15 2010 Maybe they assume you're buying tantalum caps from them that have the I wonder how magic tantalum smoke that one is responsible for releasing Neat trick for a negativeįrom obl64 at ix. Wed Sep 1 05:51:18 2010įrom: obl64 at ix. (Oren Leavitt) The input must be 2V greater than the output. > Interesting hookup.?Ĭut/Paste error from the positive regulator page. > voltages are being bypassed with tants. > Look at the standard app on the first page and notice how the NEGATIVE Hello, sorry about the crosspost - anyone know where i can find a specification for the DCB standard as used on a Roland Juno 60? Just got one and figure i'd rather make my own converter then buying one.įrom dlmanley at Wed Sep 1 05:27:54 2010įrom: dlmanley at (Dave Manley) Subject: Roland DCB standard specification (PCB is ordered.)įrom elektrodwarf at Wed Sep 1 04:09:20 2010įrom: elektrodwarf at (Karl Ekdahl) > Please note that it's a preliminary list. > A big thank you to Oscar Salas for spending hours to derive this from my can you take the output of the analyzers to front panel buses,Īnd back to inputs of the VCA's without having to scratch the PCB Subject: Preliminary Living Vocoder BOMĭoes the standard board allow random patching of the channels? > _įrom rick.jansen at Wed Sep 1 02:05:22 2010įrom: rick.jansen at (Rick Jansen) > can't believe everything you see and hear, so if you will > As Jimi once said "It just goes to show you that you > speaks truth, while On-Semi must not have checked the old ![]() Look at the standard app on the first page and notice how the NEGATIVE Subject: Who do you trust ? (somewhat OT)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |